You're out of your f***ing mind. Wars>Trek n00b.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
...can't we just enjoy them both?
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
One up- Agreed. Star Wars is better in 3 films than Trek could be with 600. We'll ignore that the prequels were mostly throwaway trash. At least Star Wars had 3 sequential good films. Star Trek can't even get 3 good shows in 40 years, much less movies.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
hey,,,,,,,,,,theres enough room in the galaxy for both,jeez,its all what a person likes and thats all that matters,i find both of them quite fasinating.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
They all suck.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Star wars was a terrible series of movies. BADDDD. Star Trek can at least be appreciated for the comedic value.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
f*** You! there's no way star trek is better!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Oh wow, it's like battle of the virgins!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
I think Wall-E is better than both of them. :)
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
FLAME WAR!!!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
I think a Colonial Viper from Battlestar Galactica would kick an X-wings's ASS anyday! Starbuck vs. Han Solo... I'd pay to see the blaster duel! LMAO! Hell, put the Galactica up against the Enterprise! BTW... Star Trek rules!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Star Wars was for children. Star Trek was for adults. Which are you?
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Only my husband cares about this.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Go Die Star TREK has advanced real world tech by 50 years....what has star wars done except launch 3 ok movies...and 3 horrid pieces of shit
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Cell phone in the 60's hmmmmm..... "Beam me up, Scotty!".
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
star track is hands down the nerdiest thing on the planet. Meanwhile, Star Wars is a borderline religion. Listen to Yoda!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
