WtF!!!! What a sick picture! Is that to represent American missionaries?
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^no dipshit
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
That pic is just disturbing.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Then why did you go? I never wanted you to leave. I am still here waiting for you.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Why am I a dipshit? The pic shows a native child being skipped toward something she doesn't want. You know it is very intelligent and thought provoking. Torn away from her family and land to learn to hold material b.s. at the highest level,while telling her she's a heathen.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Sick picture! Sick mind! Who cares about your secret!?
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^^you are a dipshit for not recognizing a famous photograph. the original was a picture of a child covered in naopolm (sp?) during the vietnam war not missionary mickey mouses skipping about with her. where you got the rest of that crap is beyond me but i also think it's a cool pic!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
2^who cares about your bitter ugliness? no one here that's for sure!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
I recognized the child dummy. It is not a famous photograph. It is someone's art, that used the photograph. Have you ever taken any college art courses? You are supposed to look at what the artist is trying to say by adding these other characters. Dumb ass. You don't just look at the pic and say hey that's weird, but it doesn't mean anything, cause that's not the original pic. It's someones statement.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^i said the child in the original was a famous photograph, not this picture mr. i went to clown college! your affinity for using good grammar really gave you away....just another dipshit who is trying to interpret art. when the new yorker start publishing your art reviews your opinion will matter, until then NEXT.......
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^ the new yorker... lame
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^^i also never said anything about it's meaning other than mickey mouse and ronald mc donald were not missionaries which was YOUR original idiotic statement. i never said it was meaningless either, that is you projecting because you took an art class in college so you know everything!!!! maybe it means that in america we live in disney world when in reality somewhere across the globe a kid is getting bombed by chemical explosives.....since the artist is underground no one will ever really know for sure will they???
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^^really? because most of the worlds great art museums are in new york and the new yorker reviews all the exhibits every two weeks so they are a pretty good authority on what is happening in the art world both nationally and internationally. it has nothing to do with their politics.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^ I take it this is a joke? Especially given that most of the world's great art museums aren't even in the Americas. There are quite a few noteworthy museums here, but far from most. Do yourself a favor and travel.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Who cares about he picture guys...I know the feeling of missing someone
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
*finally someone actually comments on what i posted, not on this pic.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^^^So the Metropolitan, the Guggenheim, the MOMA, Holocaust Museaum (to name a few) all those don't rate because it's not the Louvre? that's not even mentioning all the galleries (the chelsea gallery is my favorite!) that NYC offers. and if you have ever read a new yorker magazine you would know they also review museums from all over the world so being in new york has nothing to do with it! get a clue, all these museums have traveling exhibits so you can see the same shit at all of them. stop being a fuCking art snob, no one cares what you think!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
The Holocaust Museum is in DC
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^there is also one in NYC
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
The dipshit doesn't realize where the original picture of the girl came from.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
This picture denigrates the suffering of a child and is NOT ART but puke from a sick mind who thinks anything offensive is art. If you think this is art you are just as twisted as the person who created this crap! There is nothing socially redeeming about it and the statement it makes is leftist bull shit.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
The pic is nasty and scary. I can't imagine why anyone would use such a picture to represent somebody they miss....weird!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
It's amazing what some people consider f***ing art. Especially when tax dollars are spent to procure such items that mean absolutely nothing to the majority of people.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
So who is that? Obama and Pelosi or Obama and Reid? The person in the middle is of course the US Citizen !!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
huh?
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
The pic seems obvious to me. 2 smiley American Icons, oblivious to the disasters they cause all round the world, and happily "playing" or "leading" the girl from the infamous Napalm burning photo down the road to Fantasyland. They do not even realize that they caused major misery to innocent civilians. Pain to innocent civilians is only important if it is to Americans on their home soil. Then the whole world has to change.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^bravo!!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Have a Coke and a smile and shut the f*** up.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
i'm sorry your missing someone, your not alone though.
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^thank you
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^^^^ Thanks for the "Bravo", I thought it was pretty good, even if I say so myself!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
^your welcome!!!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
i hate this weird photoshopped image of napalm girl, and its no wonder he/she took off running. good christ!
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Viet Nam: the girl was photographed running naked after a napalm bomb attack in 1969
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
Wikipedia: Phan Thi Kim Phuc (family name) 1968, Viet Nam
|
| Remove this stupid comment |
|
